diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/bugs.json')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/bugs.json | 26 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/docs/bugs.json b/docs/bugs.json index 560176d1..28c0fe62 100644 --- a/docs/bugs.json +++ b/docs/bugs.json @@ -1,12 +1,4 @@ [ - { - "name": "EventStructWrongData", - "summary": "Using structs in events logged wrong data.", - "description": "If a struct is used in an event, the address of the struct is logged instead of the actual data.", - "introduced": "0.4.17", - "fixed": "0.4.25", - "severity": "very low" - }, { "name": "ExpExponentCleanup", "summary": "Using the ** operator with an exponent of type shorter than 256 bits can result in unexpected values.", @@ -16,6 +8,24 @@ "check": {"regex-source": "[^/]\\*\\* *[^/0-9 ]"} }, { + "name": "EventStructWrongData", + "summary": "Using structs in events logged wrong data.", + "description": "If a struct is used in an event, the address of the struct is logged instead of the actual data.", + "introduced": "0.4.17", + "fixed": "0.4.25", + "severity": "very low", + "check": {"ast-compact-json-path": "$..[?(@.nodeType === 'EventDefinition')]..[?(@.nodeType === 'UserDefinedTypeName' && @.typeDescriptions.typeString.startsWith('struct'))]"} + }, + { + "name": "NestedArrayFunctionCallDecoder", + "summary": "Calling functions that return multi-dimensional fixed-size arrays can result in memory corruption.", + "description": "If Solidity code calls a function that returns a multi-dimensional fixed-size array, array elements are incorrectly interpreted as memory pointers and thus can cause memory corruption if the return values are accessed. Calling functions with multi-dimensional fixed-size arrays is unaffected as is returning fixed-size arrays from function calls. The regular expression only checks if such functions are present, not if they are called, which is required for the contract to be affected.", + "introduced": "0.1.4", + "fixed": "0.4.22", + "severity": "medium", + "check": {"regex-source": "returns[^;{]*\\[\\s*[^\\] \\t\\r\\n\\v\\f][^\\]]*\\]\\s*\\[\\s*[^\\] \\t\\r\\n\\v\\f][^\\]]*\\][^{;]*[;{]"} + }, + { "name": "OneOfTwoConstructorsSkipped", "summary": "If a contract has both a new-style constructor (using the constructor keyword) and an old-style constructor (a function with the same name as the contract) at the same time, one of them will be ignored.", "description": "If a contract has both a new-style constructor (using the constructor keyword) and an old-style constructor (a function with the same name as the contract) at the same time, one of them will be ignored. There will be a compiler warning about the old-style constructor, so contracts only using new-style constructors are fine.", |