From 97be61b4787ccb3b52a34e625cb5f49c67ace6fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeffrey Stedfast Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 03:42:12 +0000 Subject: Don't imap_next_word(respbuf + 2), instead use imap_next_word(respbuf) or 2000-10-16 Jeffrey Stedfast * providers/imap/camel-imap-command.c (imap_read_response): Don't imap_next_word(respbuf + 2), instead use imap_next_word(respbuf) or else we'll skip over the second token. svn path=/trunk/; revision=5961 --- camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-command.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-command.c') diff --git a/camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-command.c b/camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-command.c index 1827869c14..4310bd90de 100644 --- a/camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-command.c +++ b/camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-command.c @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ imap_read_response (CamelImapStore *store, CamelException *ex) /* If it starts with a number, we might deal with * it ourselves. */ - word = imap_next_word (respbuf + 2); + word = imap_next_word (respbuf); number = strtoul (word, &p, 10); if (p != word && store->current_folder) { word = imap_next_word (p); -- cgit v1.2.3