| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
camel_service_get_settings() is now camel_service_ref_settings()
and it returns a new CamelSettings reference which the caller must
release with g_object_unref().
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These functions now return new references:
camel_session_add_service()
camel_session_list_services()
These functions have been renamed and also return new references:
camel_session_get_service() -> camel_session_ref_service()
camel_session_get_service_by_url() -> camel_session_ref_service_by_url()
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disabling the mail part of an online account through the Control Center
panel will now remove the CamelService from the EMailSession in addition
to disabling the account/identity/transport ESources, causing it to be
delisted from the account list in Preferences.
Furthermore, hide the Enabled check box for accounts linked to GOA in
Preferences. The collection ESource for these accounts can no longer
be disabled through Evolution; all such account manipulation must be
done through the Control Center panel.
Lastly, display an icon next to accounts linked to GOA in Preferences.
* Might be nice to show the actual provider icon instead of the generic
Online Accounts icon from the Control Center, but need to think about
how best to do that. Don't want a GOA dependency in core Evolution.
Maybe ESourceCollection should grow a GIcon property for the online-
accounts module in the registry service to set?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We're leaking CamelService references when we remove a CamelService
from a CamelSession. I don't yet know where or how.
If we remove a CamelService without finalizing the corresponding ESource,
and then add a new CamelService with the same UID, the ESource will have
a bidirectional "display-name" binding to multiple CamelService instances.
This creates an endless cascade of "notify" signals as soon as any of the
bound "display-name" properties change.
Until I can fix the leaking CamelService references, make the binding
one-way: ESource -> CamelService. This means the ESource's display name
is authoritative, and camel_service_set_display_name() MUST NOT be called
explicitly or else it will become out-of-sync with the ESource.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Even send-only accounts should have a backend name of "none".
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use e_source_camel_generate_subtype() to register an ESourceCamelNone
class based on the newly-registered "none" CamelProvider.
e_source_camel_register_types() won't pick up the new provider if it was
already called prior to the provider being registered. That might be a
bug... I'm not sure yet. The Camel/ESource integration is kinda messy.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
em_utils_connect_service_sync() and em_utils_disconnect_service_sync()
are no longer needed. CamelService itself now effectively does what
these functions were doing.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Always call it immediately after g_simple_async_result_new().
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
the daemon can now start the vfolder storage without bothering much with the
UI.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Evolution kinda sorta supports multiple identities by allowing users
to set up so-called "transport-only" accounts by choosing "None" for
the account type.
Add a CamelStore subclass for those types of accounts so they get
added to EMailAccountStore. It's just a stupid hack to keep another
stupid hack working, but this should sustain us until we can support
multiple identities FOR REAL.
|
| | |
|
|
|
These libraries are bound for E-D-S so they live at the lowest layer of
Evolution for now -- even libeutil can link to them (but please don't).
This is the first step toward moving mail handing to a D-Bus service.
|
