diff options
author | Not Zed <NotZed@Ximian.com> | 2002-06-04 08:06:36 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michael Zucci <zucchi@src.gnome.org> | 2002-06-04 08:06:36 +0800 |
commit | 9773d74ec175f335918279c65f36294cc9bfc9f0 (patch) | |
tree | b9e7a7404e36171a1c3f5e5a4e832aceeb0221f9 | |
parent | b0d3a768d1197ef3fdd2f5884d981a23c367d594 (diff) | |
download | gsoc2013-evolution-9773d74ec175f335918279c65f36294cc9bfc9f0.tar gsoc2013-evolution-9773d74ec175f335918279c65f36294cc9bfc9f0.tar.gz gsoc2013-evolution-9773d74ec175f335918279c65f36294cc9bfc9f0.tar.bz2 gsoc2013-evolution-9773d74ec175f335918279c65f36294cc9bfc9f0.tar.lz gsoc2013-evolution-9773d74ec175f335918279c65f36294cc9bfc9f0.tar.xz gsoc2013-evolution-9773d74ec175f335918279c65f36294cc9bfc9f0.tar.zst gsoc2013-evolution-9773d74ec175f335918279c65f36294cc9bfc9f0.zip |
Changed to check everything from the composer before the message is
2002-06-03 Not Zed <NotZed@Ximian.com>
* mail-callbacks.c (composer_get_message): Changed to check
everything from the composer before the message is requested.
Otherwise we could end up signing/encrypting it twice, etc.
* mail-format.c (handle_multipart_signed): removed some dead wood.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=17094
-rw-r--r-- | mail/ChangeLog | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mail/mail-callbacks.c | 128 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mail/mail-format.c | 2 |
3 files changed, 72 insertions, 66 deletions
diff --git a/mail/ChangeLog b/mail/ChangeLog index 5b238f41c5..46caa2cb9b 100644 --- a/mail/ChangeLog +++ b/mail/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2002-06-03 Not Zed <NotZed@Ximian.com> + + * mail-callbacks.c (composer_get_message): Changed to check + everything from the composer before the message is requested. + Otherwise we could end up signing/encrypting it twice, etc. + + * mail-format.c (handle_multipart_signed): removed some dead wood. + 2002-06-03 Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj@ximian.com> * component-factory.c (request_quit): Prompt the user to see if he diff --git a/mail/mail-callbacks.c b/mail/mail-callbacks.c index 674877c442..5570430d1b 100644 --- a/mail/mail-callbacks.c +++ b/mail/mail-callbacks.c @@ -366,44 +366,51 @@ composer_sent_cb (char *uri, CamelMimeMessage *message, gboolean sent, void *dat static CamelMimeMessage * composer_get_message (EMsgComposer *composer) { - static char *recipient_type[] = { - CAMEL_RECIPIENT_TYPE_TO, - CAMEL_RECIPIENT_TYPE_CC, - CAMEL_RECIPIENT_TYPE_BCC - }; - const CamelInternetAddress *iaddr; const MailConfigAccount *account; - CamelMimeMessage *message; - EDestination **recipients; - const char *subject; - int num_addrs, i; - - message = e_msg_composer_get_message (composer); - if (message == NULL) - return NULL; - - /* Add info about the sending account */ - account = e_msg_composer_get_preferred_account (composer); - - if (account) { - camel_medium_set_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), "X-Evolution-Account", account->name); - camel_medium_set_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), "X-Evolution-Transport", account->transport->url); - camel_medium_set_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), "X-Evolution-Fcc", account->sent_folder_uri); - if (account->id->organization) - camel_medium_set_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), "Organization", account->id->organization); - } - + CamelMimeMessage *message = NULL; + EDestination **recipients, **recipients_bcc; + char *subject; + int i; + int hidden = 0, shown = 0; + int num = 0, num_bcc = 0; + + /* We should do all of the validity checks based on the composer, and not on + the created message, as extra interaction may occur when we get the message + (e.g. to get a passphrase to sign a message) */ + /* get the message recipients */ - recipients = e_msg_composer_get_recipients (composer); - - /* Check for recipients */ - for (num_addrs = 0, i = 0; i < 3; i++) { - iaddr = camel_mime_message_get_recipients (message, recipient_type[i]); - num_addrs += iaddr ? camel_address_length (CAMEL_ADDRESS (iaddr)) : 0; + recipients = e_msg_composer_get_recipients(composer); + + /* see which ones are visible/present, etc */ + if (recipients) { + for (i=0; recipients[i] != NULL;i++) { + const char *addr = e_destination_get_address(recipients[i]); + + if (addr && addr[0]) { + num++; + if (e_destination_is_evolution_list(recipients[i]) + && !e_destination_list_show_addresses(recipients[i])) { + hidden++; + } else { + shown++; + } + } + } } - + + recipients_bcc = e_msg_composer_get_bcc(composer); + if (recipients_bcc) { + for (i=0; recipients_bcc[i] != NULL;i++) { + const char *addr = e_destination_get_address(recipients_bcc[i]); + + if (addr && addr[0]) + num_bcc++; + } + e_destination_freev (recipients_bcc); + } + /* I'm sensing a lack of love, er, I mean recipients. */ - if (num_addrs == 0) { + if (num == 0) { GtkWidget *message_box; message_box = gnome_message_box_new (_("You must specify recipients in order to " @@ -413,33 +420,13 @@ composer_get_message (EMsgComposer *composer) NULL); gnome_dialog_run_and_close (GNOME_DIALOG (message_box)); - - camel_object_unref (CAMEL_OBJECT (message)); - message = NULL; goto finished; } - if (iaddr && num_addrs == camel_address_length (CAMEL_ADDRESS (iaddr))) { - /* this means that the only recipients are Bcc's */ - - /* OK, this is an abusive hack. If someone sends a mail with a - hidden contact list on the To: line and no other recipients, - they will unknowingly create a message with only bcc: recipients. - We try to detect this and pass a flag to ask_confirm_for_only_bcc, - so that it can present the user with a dialog whose text has been - modified to reflect this situation. */ - - const char *to_header = camel_medium_get_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), CAMEL_RECIPIENT_TYPE_TO); - gboolean hidden_list_case = FALSE; - - if (to_header && !strcmp (to_header, "Undisclosed-Recipient:;")) - hidden_list_case = TRUE; - - if (!ask_confirm_for_only_bcc (composer, hidden_list_case)) { - camel_object_unref (CAMEL_OBJECT (message)); - message = NULL; + if (num == num_bcc || shown == 0) { + /* this means that the only recipients are Bcc's */ + if (!ask_confirm_for_only_bcc (composer, shown == 0)) goto finished; - } } /* Only show this warning if our default is to send html. If it isn't, we've @@ -456,23 +443,36 @@ composer_get_message (EMsgComposer *composer) if (html_problem) { html_problem = !ask_confirm_for_unwanted_html_mail (composer, recipients); - if (html_problem) { - camel_object_unref (CAMEL_OBJECT (message)); - message = NULL; + if (html_problem) goto finished; - } } } /* Check for no subject */ - subject = camel_mime_message_get_subject (message); + subject = e_msg_composer_get_subject(composer); if (subject == NULL || subject[0] == '\0') { if (!ask_confirm_for_empty_subject (composer)) { - camel_object_unref (CAMEL_OBJECT (message)); - message = NULL; + g_free(subject); goto finished; } } + g_free(subject); + + /* actually get the message now, this will sign/encrypt etc */ + message = e_msg_composer_get_message (composer); + if (message == NULL) + goto finished; + + /* Add info about the sending account */ + account = e_msg_composer_get_preferred_account (composer); + + if (account) { + camel_medium_set_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), "X-Evolution-Account", account->name); + camel_medium_set_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), "X-Evolution-Transport", account->transport->url); + camel_medium_set_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), "X-Evolution-Fcc", account->sent_folder_uri); + if (account->id->organization) + camel_medium_set_header (CAMEL_MEDIUM (message), "Organization", account->id->organization); + } /* Get the message recipients and 'touch' them, boosting their use scores */ e_destination_touchv (recipients); diff --git a/mail/mail-format.c b/mail/mail-format.c index e7ca110766..03bd1991c5 100644 --- a/mail/mail-format.c +++ b/mail/mail-format.c @@ -1756,10 +1756,8 @@ handle_multipart_signed (CamelMimePart *part, const char *mime_type, { CamelMimePart *subpart; CamelDataWrapper *wrapper; - /*CamelMultipart *mp;*/ CamelMultipartSigned *mps; gboolean output = FALSE; - int nparts, i; wrapper = camel_medium_get_content_object (CAMEL_MEDIUM (part)); |