diff options
-rw-r--r-- | extensions/Channel_Interface_Conference.xml | 400 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | extensions/misc.xml | 1 |
2 files changed, 401 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/extensions/Channel_Interface_Conference.xml b/extensions/Channel_Interface_Conference.xml new file mode 100644 index 000000000..af3e627b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/extensions/Channel_Interface_Conference.xml @@ -0,0 +1,400 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" ?> +<node name="/Channel_Interface_Conference" + xmlns:tp="http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/DbusSpec#extensions-v0"> + <tp:copyright>Copyright © 2009 Collabora Limited</tp:copyright> + <tp:copyright>Copyright © 2009 Nokia Corporation</tp:copyright> + <tp:license xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.</p> + + <p>This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + Lesser General Public License for more details.</p> + + <p>You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public + License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software + Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA + 02110-1301, USA.</p> + </tp:license> + <interface + name="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Interface.Conference.DRAFT" + tp:causes-havoc="experimental"> + <tp:added version="0.19.0">(draft 1)</tp:added> + <tp:requires interface="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel"/> + <tp:requires + interface="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Interface.Group"/> + + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>An interface for multi-user conference channels that can "continue + from" one or more individual channels.</p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>This interface addresses freedesktop.org <a + href="http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24906">bug + #24906</a> (GSM-compatible conference calls) and <a + href="http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24939">bug + #24939</a> (upgrading calls and chats to multi-user). + See those bugs for rationale and use cases.</p> + + <p>Examples of usage:</p> + + <p>Active and held GSM calls C1, C2 can be merged into a single + channel Cn with the Conference interface, by calling + <code>CreateChannel({...ChannelType: ...Call, + ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>: [C1, C2]})</code> + which returns Cn.</p> + + <p>An XMPP 1-1 conversation C1 can be continued in a newly created + multi-user chatroom Cn by calling + <code>CreateChannel({...ChannelType: ...Text, + ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>: [C1]})</code> + which returns Cn.</p> + + <p>An XMPP 1-1 conversation C1 can be continued in a specified + multi-user chatroom by calling + <code>CreateChannel({...ChannelType: ...Text, ...HandleType: ROOM, + ...TargetID: 'telepathy@conf.example.com', + ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>: [C1]})</code> + which returns a Conference channel.</p> + + <p>Either of the XMPP cases could work for Call channels, to + upgrade from 1-1 Jingle to multi-user Muji. Any of the XMPP cases + could in principle work for link-local XMPP (XEP-0174).</p> + + <p>The underlying switchboard representing an MSN 1-1 conversation C1 + with a contact X can be moved to a representation as a nameless + chatroom, Cn, to which more contacts can be invited, by calling + <code>CreateChannel({...ChannelType: ...Text, + ...<tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref>: [C1]})</code> + which returns Cn. C1 SHOULD remain open, with no underlying + switchboard attached. If X establishes a new switchboard with the + local user, C1 SHOULD pick up that switchboard rather than letting + it create a new channel. + <strong>[FIXME: should it?]</strong> + Similarly, if the local user sends a message in C1, then + a new switchboard to X should be created and associated with C1.</p> + + <p>XMPP and MSN do not natively have a concept of merging two or more + channels C1, C2... into one channel, Cn. However, the GSM-style + merging API can be supported on XMPP and MSN, as an API short-cut + for upgrading C1 into a conference Cn (which invites the + TargetHandle of C1 into Cn), then immediately inviting the + TargetHandle of C2, the TargetHandle of C3, etc. into Cn as well.</p> + + <p>With a suitable change of terminology, Skype has behaviour similar + to MSN.</p> + </tp:rationale> + + <p>The <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Interface" + >Group</tp:dbus-ref> MAY have channel-specific handles for participants; + clients SHOULD support both Conferences that have channel-specific handles, + and those that do not.</p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>In the GSM case, the Conference's Group interface MAY have + channel-specific handles, to reflect the fact that the identities of + the participants might not be known - it can be possible to know that + there is another participant in the Conference, but not know who + they are. + <strong>[FIXME: fact check from GSM gurus needed]</strong> + </p> + + <p>In the XMPP case, the Conference's Group interface SHOULD have + channel-specific handles, to reflect the fact that the participants + have MUC-specific identities, and the user might also be able to see + their global identities, or not.</p> + + <p>In most other cases, including MSN and link-local XMPP, the + Conference's Group interface SHOULD NOT have channel-specific + handles, since users' identities are always visible.</p> + </tp:rationale> + + <p>Connection managers implementing channels with this interface + MUST NOT allow the object paths of channels that could be merged + into a Conference to be re-used, unless the channel re-using the + object path is equivalent to the channel that previously used it.</p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>If you upgrade some channels into a conference, and then close + the original channels, <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref> + (which is immutable) will contain paths to channels which no longer + exist. This implies that you should not re-use channel object paths, + unless future incarnations of the path are equivalent.</p> + + <p>For instance, on protocols where you can only have + zero or one 1-1 text channels with Emily at one time, it would + be OK to re-use the same object path for every 1-1 text channel + with Emily; but on protocols where this is not true, it would + be misleading.</p> + </tp:rationale> + + </tp:docstring> + + <property name="Channels" tp:name-for-bindings="Channels" + access="read" type="ao"> + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>The individual <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy">Channel</tp:dbus-ref>s that + are continued by this conference, which have the same <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel" + >ChannelType</tp:dbus-ref> as this one, but with <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel" + >TargetHandleType</tp:dbus-ref> = CONTACT.</p> + + <p>This property MUST NOT be requestable. + <strong>[FIXME: or would it be better for this one, and not IC, to be + requestable?]</strong> + </p> + + <p>Change notification is via the + <tp:member-ref>ChannelMerged</tp:member-ref> and + <tp:member-ref>ChannelRemoved</tp:member-ref> signals.</p> + </tp:docstring> + </property> + + <signal name="ChannelMerged" tp:name-for-bindings="Channel_Merged"> + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>Emitted when a new channel is added to the value of + <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>.</p> + </tp:docstring> + + <arg name="Channel" type="o"> + <tp:docstring>The channel that was added to + <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>.</tp:docstring> + </arg> + </signal> + + <signal name="ChannelRemoved" tp:name-for-bindings="Channel_Removed"> + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>Emitted when a channel is removed from the value of + <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>, either because it closed + or because it was split using the <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Interface" + >Splittable.DRAFT.Split</tp:dbus-ref> method.</p> + + <p><strong>[FIXME: relative ordering of this vs. Closed? Do we + care?]</strong></p> + </tp:docstring> + + <arg name="Channel" type="o"> + <tp:docstring>The channel that was removed from + <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>.</tp:docstring> + </arg> + </signal> + + <property name="InitialChannels" tp:name-for-bindings="Initial_Channels" + access="read" type="ao"> + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>The initial value of <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>.</p> + + <p>This property SHOULD be requestable. Omitting it from a request is + equivalent to providing it with an empty list as value. Requests + where its value has at least two elements SHOULD be expected to + succeed on any implementation of this interface.</p> + + <p>Whether a request with 0 or 1 elements in the list will succeed is + indicated by <tp:member-ref>SupportsNonMerges</tp:member-ref>.</p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>In GSM, a pair of calls can be merged into a conference. In XMPP + and MSN, you can create a new chatroom, or upgrade one 1-1 channel + into a chatroom; however, on these protocols, it is also possible + to fake GSM-style merging by upgrading the first channel, then + inviting the targets of all the other channels into it.</p> + </tp:rationale> + + <p>If possible, the <tp:member-ref>Channels</tp:member-ref>' states SHOULD + NOT be altered by merging them into a conference. However, depending on + the protocol, the Channels MAY be placed in a "frozen" state by placing + them in this property's value or by calling + <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Interface" + >MergeableConference.DRAFT.Merge</tp:dbus-ref> on them. + <strong>[FIXME: there's nothing in RequestableChannelClasses yet + to say what will happen, see #24906 comment 6]</strong></p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>In Jingle, nothing special will happen to merged calls. UIs MAY + automatically place calls on hold before merging them, if that is + the desired behaviour; this SHOULD always work. Not doing + an implicit hold/unhold seems to preserve least-astonishment.</p> + + <p><strong>[FIXME: check whether ring supports faking Hold on both + channels, as it probably should: see #24906 comment 6]</strong> + </p> + + <p>In GSM, the calls that are merged go into a state similar to + Hold, but they cannot be unheld, only split from the conference + call using <tp:dbus-ref namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy" + >Channel.Interface.Splittable.DRAFT.Split</tp:dbus-ref>.</p> + </tp:rationale> + + <p>Depending on the protocol, it might be signalled to remote users + that this channel is a continuation of all the requested channels, + or that it is only a continuation of the first channel in the + list.</p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>In MSN, the conference steals the underlying switchboard (protocol + construct) from one of its component channels, so the conference + appears to remote users to be a continuation of that channel and no + other. The connection manager has to make some arbitrary choice, so + we arbitrarily mandate that it SHOULD choose the first channel in + the list as the one to continue.</p> + </tp:rationale> + + <p>This property is immutable.</p> + </tp:docstring> + </property> + + <property name="InitialInviteeHandles" + tp:name-for-bindings="Initial_Invitee_Handles" + access="read" type="au" tp:type="Contact_Handle[]"> + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>A list of additional contacts invited to this conference when it + was created.</p> + + <p>This property SHOULD be requestable, and appear in the allowed + properties in <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Connection.Interface.Requests" + >RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref>, in all connection + managers that can implement its semantics (in practice, this is + likely to mean exactly those connection managers where + <tp:member-ref>SupportsNonMerges</tp:member-ref> will be true).</p> + + <p>If included in a request, the given contacts are automatically + invited into the new channel, as if they had been added with + <tp:dbus-ref namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Interface" + >Group.AddMembers</tp:dbus-ref>(InitialInviteeHandles, + <tp:member-ref>InvitationMessage</tp:member-ref> immediately after + the channel was created.</p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>This is a simple convenience API for the common case that a UI + upgrades a 1-1 chat to a multi-user chat solely in order to invite + someone else to participate.</p> + </tp:rationale> + + <p>At most one of InitialInviteeHandles and InitialInviteeIDs may + appear in each request.</p> + + <p>If the local user was not the initiator of this channel, the + <tp:dbus-ref namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Interface" + >Group.SelfHandle</tp:dbus-ref> SHOULD appear in the value of this + property, together with any other contacts invited at the same time + (if that information is known).</p> + + <p>This property is immutable.</p> + </tp:docstring> + </property> + + <property name="InitialInviteeIDs" + tp:name-for-bindings="Initial_Invitee_IDs" + access="read" type="as"> + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>A list of additional contacts invited to this conference when it + was created.</p> + + <p>This property SHOULD be requestable, as an alternative to + <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref>. Its semantics + are the same, except that it takes a list of the string + representations of contact handles.</p> + + <p>At most one of InitialInviteeHandles and InitialInviteeIDs may + appear in each request.</p> + + <p>When a channel is created, the values of InitialInviteeHandles and + InitialInviteeIDs MUST correspond to each other.</p> + + <p>This property is immutable.</p> + </tp:docstring> + </property> + + <property name="InvitationMessage" tp:name-for-bindings="Invitation_Message" + access="read" type="s"> + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p>The message that was sent to the + <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> when they were + invited.</p> + + <p>This property SHOULD be requestable, and appear in the allowed + properties in <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Connection.Interface.Requests" + >RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref>, in protocols where + invitations can have an accompanying text message.</p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>This allows invitations with a message to be sent when using + <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeHandles</tp:member-ref> or + <tp:member-ref>InitialInviteeIDs</tp:member-ref>.</p> + </tp:rationale> + + <p>If the local user was not the initiator of this channel, the + message with which they were invited (if any) SHOULD appear in the + value of this property.</p> + + <p>This property is immutable.</p> + </tp:docstring> + </property> + + <property name="SupportsNonMerges" + tp:name-for-bindings="Supports_Non_Merges" + access="read" type="b"> + <tp:docstring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <p><strong>[FIXME: needs a better name; or perhaps it could be implied + by InitialInviteeHandles being requestable in XMPP/MSN but not in + GSM?]</strong></p> + + <p>If true, requests with <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref> + omitted, empty, or one element long should be expected to succeed.</p> + + <p>This property SHOULD appear in <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Connection.Interface.Requests" + >RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref> for + conference channels if and only if its value on those channels will + be true.</p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>Putting this in <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Connection.Interface.Requests" + >RequestableChannelClasses</tp:dbus-ref> means clients can find + out whether their request will succeed early enough to do + something about it.</p> + + <p>In XMPP, you can request a channel of type ROOM without + incorporating any 1-1 chats at all - indeed, this is the normal + way to do it - or as a continuation of a single 1-1 chat, and then + invite other people in later.</p> + + <p>The sense of this property is a bit awkward, but it avoids making it + an anti-capability. If the sense were inverted, then its presence in + RequestableChannelClasses would imply that the protocol <em>lacks</em> + a feature; as it stands, it is additive. (Contrast with + <tp:dbus-ref + namespace="org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Channel.Type.StreamedMedia" + >ImmutableStreams</tp:dbus-ref>, which is the wrong way around for + backwards-compatibility reasons.)</p> + </tp:rationale> + + <p>If false, <tp:member-ref>InitialChannels</tp:member-ref> SHOULD be + supplied in all requests for this channel class, and contain at least + two channels. Requests where this requirement is not met SHOULD fail + with NotImplemented. + </p> + + <tp:rationale> + <p>In GSM, you can only make a conference call by merging at least + two channels. + <strong>[FIXME: the CM could conceivably fake it, but that would be + rather nasty]</strong> + </p> + </tp:rationale> + </tp:docstring> + </property> + + </interface> +</node> diff --git a/extensions/misc.xml b/extensions/misc.xml index 746cd9074..6eea49a2d 100644 --- a/extensions/misc.xml +++ b/extensions/misc.xml @@ -7,5 +7,6 @@ <xi:include href="Channel_Handler.xml"/> <xi:include href="Tube_Handler.xml"/> <xi:include href="Debug.xml" /> +<xi:include href="Channel_Interface_Conference.xml" /> </tp:spec> |