Make the Solidity repository standalone.

This commit is the culmination of several months of work to decouple Solidity from the webthree-umbrella so that it can be developed in parallel with cpp-ethereum (the Ethereum C++ runtime) and so that even for the Solidity unit-tests there is no hard-dependency onto the C++ runtime.

The Tests-over-IPC refactoring was a major step in the same process which was already committed.

This commit contains the following changes:

- A subset of the CMake functionality in webthree-helpers was extracted and tailored for Solidity into ./cmake.   Further cleanup is certainly possible.
- A subset of the libdevcore functionality in libweb3core was extracted and tailored for Solidity into ./libdevcore.   Further cleanup is certainly possible
- The gas price constants in EVMSchedule were orphaned into libevmasm.
- Some other refactorings and cleanups were made to sever unnecessary EVM dependencies in the Solidity unit-tests.
- TravisCI and Appveyor support was added, covering builds and running of the unit-tests (Linux and macOS only for now)
- A bug-fix was made to get the Tests-over-IPC running on macOS.
- There are still reliability issues in the unit-tests, which need immediate attention.    The Travis build has been flipped to run the unit-tests 5 times, to try to flush these out.
- The Emscripten automation which was previously in webthree-umbrella was merged into the TravisCI automation here.
- The development ZIP deployment step has been commented out, but we will want to read that ONLY for release branch.

Further iteration on these changes will definitely be needed, but I feel these have got to sufficient maturity than holding them back further isn't winning us anything.    It is go time :-)

3 files changed, 24 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/test/contracts/AuctionRegistrar.cpp b/test/contracts/AuctionRegistrar.cpp
index 9aa47189..8860727d 100644
--- a/test/contracts/AuctionRegistrar.cpp
+++ b/test/contracts/AuctionRegistrar.cpp
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
 #include <string>
 #include <tuple>
 #include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
+#include <libdevcore/ABI.h>
 #include <libdevcore/Hash.h>
-#include <libethcore/ABI.h>
 #include <test/libsolidity/SolidityExecutionFramework.h>
 
 using namespace std;
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(double_reserve_long)
 	registrar.reserve(name);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(registrar.owner(name), m_sender);
 
-	sendEther(account(1), u256(10) * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), u256(10) * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	registrar.reserve(name);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(registrar.owner(name), account(0));
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(properties)
 	for (string const& name: names)
 	{
 		m_sender = account(0);
-		sendEther(account(count), u256(20) * eth::ether);
+		sendEther(account(count), u256(20) * ether);
 		m_sender = account(count);
 		auto sender = m_sender;
 		addr += count;
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(disown)
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(registrar.name(u160(124)), name);
 
 	// someone else tries disowning
-	sendEther(account(1), u256(10) * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), u256(10) * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	registrar.disown(name);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(registrar.owner(name), account(0));
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(auction_bidding)
 	registrar.setNextValue(12);
 	registrar.reserve(name);
 	// another bid by someone else
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	m_rpc.test_modifyTimestamp(startTime + 2 * m_biddingTime - 50);
 	registrar.setNextValue(13);
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(auction_renewal)
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(registrar.owner(name), m_sender);
 
 	// try to re-register before interval end
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	m_rpc.test_modifyTimestamp(currentTimestamp() + m_renewalInterval - 1);
 	registrar.setNextValue(80);
diff --git a/test/contracts/FixedFeeRegistrar.cpp b/test/contracts/FixedFeeRegistrar.cpp
index 8cb8257a..63db0531 100644
--- a/test/contracts/FixedFeeRegistrar.cpp
+++ b/test/contracts/FixedFeeRegistrar.cpp
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(double_reserve)
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunctionWithValue("reserve(string)", m_fee, encodeDyn(name)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_CHECK(callContractFunction("owner(string)", encodeDyn(name)) == encodeArgs(h256(account(0), h256::AlignRight)));
 
-	sendEther(account(1), 100 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 100 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunctionWithValue("reserve(string)", m_fee, encodeDyn(name)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_CHECK(callContractFunction("owner(string)", encodeDyn(name)) == encodeArgs(h256(account(0), h256::AlignRight)));
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(properties)
 	{
 		addr++;
 		m_sender = account(0);
-		sendEther(account(count), 100 * eth::ether);
+		sendEther(account(count), 100 * ether);
 		m_sender = account(count);
 		Address owner = m_sender;
 		// setting by sender works
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(properties)
 		count++;
 		// but not by someone else
 		m_sender = account(0);
-		sendEther(account(count), 100 * eth::ether);
+		sendEther(account(count), 100 * ether);
 		m_sender = account(count);
 		BOOST_CHECK(callContractFunction("owner(string)", encodeDyn(name)) == encodeArgs(h256(owner, h256::AlignRight)));
 		BOOST_CHECK(callContractFunction("setAddr(string,address)", u256(0x40), addr + 1, u256(name.length()), name) == encodeArgs());
diff --git a/test/contracts/Wallet.cpp b/test/contracts/Wallet.cpp
index fbab2404..27bdb396 100644
--- a/test/contracts/Wallet.cpp
+++ b/test/contracts/Wallet.cpp
@@ -474,13 +474,13 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(add_owners)
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(account(1), h256::AlignRight)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(account(1), h256::AlignRight)) == encodeArgs(true));
 	// now let the new owner add someone
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x13)) == encodeArgs(true));
 	// and check that a non-owner cannot add a new owner
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(2), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(2), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(2);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x20)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x20)) == encodeArgs(false));
@@ -559,17 +559,17 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(multisig_value_transfer)
 	// check that balance is and stays zero at destination address
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	auto ophash = callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 100, 0x60, 0x00);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(2), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(2), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(2);
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", ophash);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(3), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(3), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(3);
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", ophash);
 	// now it should go through
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(revoke_addOwner)
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs(false));
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs(false));
@@ -598,12 +598,12 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(revoke_addOwner)
 	m_sender = deployer;
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("revoke(bytes32)", opHash) == encodeArgs());
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(2), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(2), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(2);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs(false));
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(3), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(3), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(3);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("addOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs());
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("isOwner(address)", h256(0x33)) == encodeArgs(true));
@@ -621,24 +621,24 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(revoke_transaction)
 	Address deployer = m_sender;
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	auto opHash = callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 100, 0x60, 0x00);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(2), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(2), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(2);
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", opHash);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(callContractFunction("revoke(bytes32)", opHash) == encodeArgs());
 	m_sender = deployer;
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", opHash);
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(3), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(3), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(3);
 	callContractFunction("confirm(bytes32)", opHash);
 	// now it should go through
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(daylimit)
 
 	// try to send tx over daylimit
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(1);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(
 		callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 150, 0x60, 0x00) !=
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(daylimit)
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	// try to send tx under daylimit by stranger
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(4), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(4), 10 * ether);
 	m_sender = account(4);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(
 		callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 90, 0x60, 0x00) ==
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(daylimit)
 	BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(balanceAt(Address(0x05)), 0);
 	// now send below limit by owner
 	m_sender = account(0);
-	sendEther(account(1), 10 * eth::ether);
+	sendEther(account(1), 10 * ether);
 	BOOST_REQUIRE(
 		callContractFunction("execute(address,uint256,bytes)", h256(0x05), 90, 0x60, 0x00) ==
 		encodeArgs(u256(0))